Thesis: Napoleon Bonaparte achieved his success as an emperor because of his ability on the battlefield to use a combination of infantry and cavalry assaults against the weak points of the enemy army, rather than traditional maneuvering and frontal assaults.
Definitions: To be named later
- Before Napoleon became a general on the battle field, leaders were chosen by birthright instead of on merit
- These generals outmaneuvered each other until one was pinned down and merely surrendered
- Most of the battles taking place consisted of all out frontal assaults
- The infantry was the most important factor in his military strategies
- The infantry was the larger part of his army
- Infantry also in the thick of all of the action
- They were kept together by non-commissioned officers who lead from the front
- They kept a sabre to direct the battle
- They were also responsible for keeping the units togetherb
- If the battle was going ill, most soldiers to would be looking towards their own safety
- To prevent this, the men fought shoulder to shoulder two or three ranks deep
- Also there was a cavalry picket line stationed to the rear to "encourage" the soldiers to return to the battle
- Napoleon determined his own battlefields to his advantage
- He fought in several places where past generals had not, including roofs, and city streets
- He tended to avoid unfavorable terrain such as swamp and woods
- On the battlefield, cavalry and infantry played important roles, but the battle was won with infantry
- Napoleon employed constant drills to keep them ready for battle at any time
- They marched in a long, narrow column that could potentially stretch for miles.
- If ambushed, it was wide open for gun or canon fire.
- One of his most important drills was changing from a column to a line of battle and vice versa
- It was very difficult to change from column to a battle line
- Whenever the move was preformed, they were under fire
- Any disruption was deadly
- If there was a natural barrier, the entire line was stopped
- Infantry was weak against a cavalry charge because their guns were only effective for 50 yards.
- They had different formations depending on whether they faced cavalry, or infantry
- Another revolutionary tactic of Napoleon was the use of skirmishers
- These men would harass the enemy endlessly
- They would cut, dash, and run
- Then report what they found to their commander
- These men would usually be equipped with muskets and bayonets, or they would be grenadiers
- The cavalry played a lesser role than in earlier times, although it was still important
- Cavalry was not longer used for heavy engagements
- They were more of a scouting force
- Reporting what kind of weapons the enemy had
- And the size of the army
- If cavalry engaged at all
- They engaged other cavalry to neutralize it
- they did a quick charge to pin their enemy in one place
- Or they were engaged in hopes of a quick victory
No comments:
Post a Comment